Why the Exit Window Exists and Why It Closes
At retirement, most people experience the lowest taxable income of their adult lives. The paycheck stopped. Social Security may not have started yet. Pension income, if any, may be modest. Required Minimum Distributions have not begun. For the first time in decades, your taxable income may be well within the 12% or 22% bracket. At age 73, that window closes. RMDs begin. The IRS calculates a mandatory withdrawal based on the prior year-end account balance divided by a life expectancy factor from the Uniform Lifetime Table. At 73, that factor is 26.5, meaning roughly 3.77% of the balance must come out. On $1,200,000, that is $45,280 in year one - all taxable as ordinary income. By age 80, the factor drops to 20.2, meaning about 5% must be withdrawn. By 85, it is 16.0, meaning 6.25%. And the account balance itself may have grown during that time, pushing the RMD dollar amount higher even as the percentage rises. Add Social Security benefits - up to 85% of which become taxable once combined income exceeds $44,000 for married couples - and the income stack at 80 is often far higher than at 62. The exit strategy is designed to reduce the account balance that generates those RMDs - by moving money from the traditional IRA or 401(k) into Roth, into charitable vehicles, or by drawing it out strategically - before the mandatory withdrawal machine turns on.
Key Stat: A retiree with $1,200,000 in a traditional IRA who does nothing between ages 63 and 73 will face a year-one RMD of approximately $45,280 at age 73, assuming 5% average annual growth pushed the balance to $1,955,000. Adding $30,000 in Social Security, combined income is roughly $75,280 - pushing 85% of Social Security into taxable territory and landing them in the 22% bracket with minimal flexibility. A systematic exit strategy executed from 63 to 73 can reduce the RMD balance and its tax consequences significantly.
Tool 1 - Roth Conversions: The Primary Exit Mechanism
The core of the qualified plan exit strategy is systematic Roth conversion. Each year during the exit window, you calculate how much bracket space you have below a target ceiling - typically the top of the 22% bracket or just below the first IRMAA threshold - and convert that amount from traditional IRA to Roth IRA. The 2026 tax brackets for married filers: 12% bracket tops at $100,800 of taxable income. The 22% bracket tops at $211,400. The first IRMAA tier for Medicare begins at $218,001 of MAGI. A retiree with $40,000 of baseline taxable income (pension plus some interest) and the $32,200 standard deduction has taxable income of $7,800 before conversions. They have nearly $93,000 of room in the 12% bracket and another $110,000 before hitting 22%. Converting $80,000 per year at blended 12-22% rates is far cheaper than paying 22-24% on the same money as RMDs later. Over a 10-year window, $80,000 per year in conversions moves $800,000 from traditional to Roth. The balance remaining in the traditional IRA generates smaller RMDs. Those smaller RMDs stack less aggressively on Social Security. IRMAA exposure is reduced. And the Roth balance grows tax-free, passing to heirs without income tax or RMDs.
Tool 2 - NUA: Extracting Company Stock at Capital Gains Rates
If your qualified plan holds employer company stock with substantial appreciation, Net Unrealized Appreciation (NUA) allows you to extract that stock as a lump-sum distribution and pay only long-term capital gains rates on the appreciation above the plan's cost basis - rather than ordinary income rates on the full value. The NUA extraction requires a qualifying event (retirement, age 59.5, separation from service) and a lump-sum distribution of the entire plan balance in one tax year. The cost basis of the stock is taxed as ordinary income at distribution. The NUA - everything above the basis - is taxed at long-term capital gains rates when eventually sold, with a maximum rate of 20% rather than the 37% ordinary income ceiling. For a plan participant with $400,000 of company stock and a $60,000 basis, the ordinary income at distribution is $60,000. The $340,000 in NUA is taxed at capital gains rates when sold. Compared to rolling to an IRA and withdrawing at 37%, the tax savings on the NUA portion alone can exceed $50,000. NUA is not always the right choice - it works best when the basis ratio is low (basis is a small fraction of total value) and when the retiree can hold the distributed stock for optimal sale timing. But for participants with significant low-basis employer stock, NUA is a powerful exit tool that pairs naturally with the broader conversion strategy.
- Start exit planning no later than age 60 - 13 years of runway before RMDs begin at 73 gives maximum flexibility
- In each year of the exit window, fill lower tax brackets first with Roth conversions before exceeding 22% or crossing an IRMAA threshold
- If employer stock with low basis exists in the plan, evaluate NUA before completing any rollover - once you roll to an IRA, NUA treatment is no longer available
- Use Qualified Charitable Distributions from the IRA beginning at 70.5 to reduce the balance while satisfying future RMDs
- Keep MAGI below the first IRMAA threshold ($218,001 married in 2026) during the exit window to avoid Medicare surcharges in subsequent years
- Track the Roth IRA 5-year clock for each conversion - funds converted in 2026 are accessible penalty-free beginning January 1, 2031
Tool 3 - QCDs and Spend-Down: Reducing the Balance Before 73
For retirees with charitable goals, Qualified Charitable Distributions beginning at 70.5 reduce the traditional IRA balance directly. Every dollar directed to charity via QCD is a dollar that will never generate a taxable RMD. The QCD satisfies the RMD requirement without appearing in income, avoiding the cascading effects on Social Security taxation and IRMAA. For retirees without major charitable goals, the spend-down approach involves drawing from traditional accounts to fund current expenses during the exit window rather than drawing from Roth or taxable accounts. This intentionally depletes the traditional balance, reducing future RMDs. The trade-off is paying taxes now rather than later, but paying at lower bracket rates during the exit window rather than higher rates when RMDs compound with Social Security. The optimal withdrawal order during the exit window reverses the conventional wisdom of spending taxable accounts first. Instead, the exit strategy often calls for drawing some traditional IRA funds (up to the desired bracket ceiling) for current expenses while simultaneously converting additional amounts to Roth. This depletes the traditional balance faster and shifts the compounding to the tax-free side.
Modeling the 10-Year Exit Plan: A Framework
An effective qualified plan exit strategy requires a year-by-year model. The model tracks starting balance in the traditional IRA, estimated growth rate, planned conversion amount, any NUA distributions, QCDs, and the projected balance at age 73 - along with the estimated year-one RMD. A retiree at age 63 with $1,200,000 in a traditional IRA, $30,000 annual Social Security starting at 67, and a $15,000 pension, converting $70,000 per year for 10 years (at approximately 18% blended federal rate) might pay roughly $126,000 in conversion tax over the decade. The remaining traditional balance at 73, after conversions and assumed 5% growth on the unconverted portion, might be approximately $600,000 - producing a year-one RMD of roughly $22,600 instead of $45,000-plus from the fully untouched scenario. The Roth balance at 73, after 10 years of $70,000 annual conversions growing tax-free, might be approximately $880,000. That entire amount - and its future growth - is RMD-free, income-tax-free when withdrawn, and passes to heirs without income tax. Some retirees supplement income during conversion years with tax-free sources to keep base income low and maximize conversion room. Roth IRA withdrawals of contributions (tax and penalty-free at any age), HSA distributions for medical expenses, and for those who funded one, policy loans from a life insurance policy are all examples of income sources that do not appear in MAGI. These tools function as the income floor that keeps the conversion efficient rather than as standalone strategies.
The IUL Solution: During the qualified plan exit window, base income level directly determines how much you can convert at lower brackets. Every dollar of taxable income from other sources reduces the conversion room available. Some retirees who funded an IUL during their working years draw tax-free policy loans for living expenses during conversion years, keeping their MAGI low and maximizing the amount they can convert at 12% or 22% rather than 24% or higher. IUL serves a narrow but specific function here: it is a tax-free income source that competes with Roth contributions and HSA distributions for the role of keeping base income low during the conversion window. It is one option, not the primary strategy.
Want to see how a tax-free retirement strategy would work in your situation? Explore your options here.